India is back as a non-permanent member on the United Nations Security Council.
Q.What objective India should pursue in its stint at the UNSC? What challenges India will face in achieving these objectives?
India at the UNSC
Take a look at its seven previous terms, and what its agenda will be amid events concerning China, Pakistan and the US:
In 1950-51, India, as President of UNSC, presided over the adoption of resolutions calling for the cessation of hostilities during the Korean War and for assistance to the Republic of Korea.
In 1967-68, India co-sponsored Resolution 238 extending mandate of UN mission in Cyprus.
In 1972-73, India pushed strongly for admission of Bangladesh into the UN. The resolution was not adopted because of a veto by a permanent member.
In 1977-78, India was a strong voice for Africa in the UNSC and spoke against apartheid. Then External Affairs Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee spoke in UNSC for Namibia's independence in 1978.
In 1984-85, India was a leading voice in UNSC for resolution of conflicts in the Middle East, especially Palestine and Lebanon.
In 1991-92, PM P V Narasimha Rao participated in the first-ever summit-level meeting of the UNSC and spoke on its role in the maintenance of peace and security.
In 2011-2012, India was a strong voice for developing world, peacekeeping, counter-terrorism and Africa. The first statement on Syria was during India's Presidency at the UNSC.
India's diverse role-play
India played an active role in discussions on all issues related to international peace and security.
It included several new challenges which the UNSC was called upon to deal with in Afghanistan, Cote d'Ivoire, Iraq, Libya, South Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
In view of the threat posed to international trade and security by piracy off the coast of Somalia, India promoted international cooperation against the pirates.
At India's initiative, the UNSC mandated international cooperation for release of hostages taken by pirates as well as for prosecution of those taking hostages and those aiding and abetting these acts.
India also worked for enhancing international cooperation in counter-terrorism, prevention of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction to non-state actors, and the strengthening of UN peacekeeping efforts.
Issues at UNSC: The politics within
The seven previous terms have given Indian diplomats the experience of how diplomacy is conducted at the multilateral setting.
There have been instances where permanent members would like the non-permanent members to be "cooperative", and no stand in the way of major resolutions.
Most non-permanent members get influenced by the P-5 members. They did not wish to irritate the permanent members and were keen to be perceived by them as 'cooperative'.
This was precisely how the permanent members would like the non-permanent members to behave.
Walk-alone moves by India
The Indians took P5 work more seriously and consequently had to fight a lonely battle.
This was the time when the Gulf War erupted and India voted in favour of the US-sponsored resolution in April 1991.
India's vote was dictated by pragmatic considerations.
The US had made it clear to India that failure to support the resolution would make it very difficult for them to help India in the World Bank and the IMF.
Back then, India was going through a severe balance-of-payment crisis and needed funds from these organisations.
Also, India needed the US on its side, if and when the Kashmir issue came up.
Twenty years later, when India again became a non-permanent member at the UNSC, it was stronger economically but still had to negotiate politics within the Council.
Ugly faces of the council
Most professional diplomats shed their innocence before they arrive at the horse-shoe table around which the Security Council meets.
In the real world of foreign and security policy, decision-makers are invariably confronted by cruel choices that are equally problematic and come in various shades.
0 comments:
Post a Comment