тЧЗ In the Keshavananda bharati case 1973 SC held that Preamble can not be amended as it is not a part of Constitution.
тЧЗ Later SC reversed its decision and held that Preamble is a part of Constitution and can be amended.
тЧЗ However, No amendment can be done to Basic features mentioned in Preamble.
тЧЗ Preamble only amended once so far by 42nd CAA which added three new words :-
тАв Socialist,
тАв Secular and
тАв Integrity.
ЁЯФ╕я╕ПIn the Berubari Union case (1960), the Supreme Court said that the Preamble shows the general purposes behind the several provisions in the Constitution, and is thus a key to the minds of the makers of the Constitution.
тЧЗ In the Berubari union case (1960), SC held that Preamble is not a part of Constitution.
ЁЯФ╕я╕ПDespite this recognition of the significance of the Preamble, the Supreme Court specifically opined that Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.
ЁЯФ╕я╕ПIn the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), the Supreme Court rejected the earlier opinion and held that Preamble is a part of the Constitution.
тЧЗ In the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), SC rejected earlier opinion and held Preamble is a part of Constitution.
ЁЯФ╕я╕ПIn the LIC of India case (1995) also, the Supreme Court again held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution.
тЧЗ In the LIC of India case ( 1995 ) SC again held that the Constitution is an integral part of Constitution.
ЁЯФ╕я╕П However, two things should be noted :-
1. The Preamble is neither a source of power to legislature nor a prohibition upon the powers of legislature.
2. It is non-justiciable, that is, its provisions are not enforceable in courts of law.
0 comments:
Post a Comment